<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wordpress Vulnerabilities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.reaper-x.com/2006/08/20/wordpress-vulnerabilities/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.reaper-x.com/2006/08/20/wordpress-vulnerabilities/</link>
	<description>Technology, Games, Blogging ... Whatever</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 07:22:54 +0700</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The rose love</title>
		<link>http://www.reaper-x.com/2006/08/20/wordpress-vulnerabilities/comment-page-1/#comment-211190</link>
		<dc:creator>The rose love</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 01:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reaper-x.com/2006/08/20/wordpress-vulnerabilities.htm#comment-211190</guid>
		<description>Write quite good.Give you to encourage, next time again come to your crest once(*__*)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Write quite good.Give you to encourage, next time again come to your crest once(*__*)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reaper-X</title>
		<link>http://www.reaper-x.com/2006/08/20/wordpress-vulnerabilities/comment-page-1/#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>Reaper-X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 02:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reaper-x.com/2006/08/20/wordpress-vulnerabilities.htm#comment-178</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re correct about that timethief, actually since i saw a post at Wordpress.org forums about speed issue at Wordpress 2.0.4 and they choose to roll back into version 2.0.2 that has important security issue is a bad move ... but that&#039;s just my opinion .. lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re correct about that timethief, actually since i saw a post at Wordpress.org forums about speed issue at Wordpress 2.0.4 and they choose to roll back into version 2.0.2 that has important security issue is a bad move &#8230; but that&#8217;s just my opinion .. lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timethief/coyote</title>
		<link>http://www.reaper-x.com/2006/08/20/wordpress-vulnerabilities/comment-page-1/#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>timethief/coyote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 21:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reaper-x.com/2006/08/20/wordpress-vulnerabilities.htm#comment-173</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been so busy that I&#039;m backdated when It comes to reading your posts. As a blogger the most important thing to me is the security of my blog. Therefore it seems to me sacrificing security for speed is just plain dumb. But I suppose if all a blogger is posting is youtubes and stuff lifted from other sites without doing any actual research and writing of their own then security wouldn&#039;t be that important. I&#039;ve read a lot of blogs and it seems to me that those that have original content are rare indeed but saying so isn&#039;t being &quot;nice&quot; is it? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been so busy that I&#8217;m backdated when It comes to reading your posts. As a blogger the most important thing to me is the security of my blog. Therefore it seems to me sacrificing security for speed is just plain dumb. But I suppose if all a blogger is posting is youtubes and stuff lifted from other sites without doing any actual research and writing of their own then security wouldn&#8217;t be that important. I&#8217;ve read a lot of blogs and it seems to me that those that have original content are rare indeed but saying so isn&#8217;t being &#8220;nice&#8221; is it? ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
